Search for: "Pocket Veto Case" Results 21 - 40 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 10:14 am by Courtney Minick
The Supreme Court found that portions of the vetoes did not comply with the item-veto amendment of the state constitution and because the Governor unconstitutionally item vetoed “conditions or restrictions” on the appropriations without vetoing the accompanying appropriations; and when the Governor impermissibly item vetoes a condition on an appropriation during the pocket veto period, the appropriation item fails to become… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:14 am by Courtney Minick
The Supreme Court found that portions of the vetoes did not comply with the item-veto amendment of the state constitution and because the Governor unconstitutionally item vetoed “conditions or restrictions” on the appropriations without vetoing the accompanying appropriations; and when the Governor impermissibly item vetoes a condition on an appropriation during the pocket veto period, the appropriation item fails to become law. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 12:49 pm by Jason Smith
The members of the 9th District delegation issued the following statement regarding Governor’s Christie’s pocket veto of the Sandy clawback bill: “For those Sandy victims who’ve had too many sleepless nights contending with an endless bureaucratic nightmare, we worked together with the New Jersey Organizing Project to advance this legislation with the intent of providing the necessary assistance, including mediation, to help resolve clawback cases. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 10:46 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple cases is thatApple will be allowed to argue at the February 2023 trial in the SEP case that Ericsson "has engaged in a continuing anticompetitive scheme" (which is simply an allegation of FRAND abuse styled as an unclean hands defense) and that Ericsson's allegedly non-FRAND royalty demands constitute patent misuse, andin a non-SEP case Apple will be allowed to claim that Ericsson is engaging in patent misuse by seeking a U.S. import ban over non-SEPS… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:28 am by Joe May
Campaign Finance “‘Citizens United’ Case Gets Renewed Scrutiny” by David Welna on NPR.org. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Michael Greibok, FreedomWorks via Scott Shackford] Maryland delegate alleges that vetoed bill “would have made it easier for criminals to get their forfeited property back,” seemingly unaware that it focused on rights of owners *not* found guilty of anything [Haven Shoemaker, Carroll County Times] Arizona counties said to have nearly free rein in spending money [Arizona Republic via Coyote] I took part last week in a panel discussion in Washington, D.C. on civil asset… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by Zachary Spilman
The bill was presented to the President for signature on December 21 and, absent a major political shift (a pocket veto appears impossible), will become law. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 5:59 pm by Maseeh Moradi
By Danielle Haley* In late October, Governor Cuomo vetoed a bill that “Relates to the definition of a gravity knife. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
There are, however, plenty of other reasons why Congress did not sue the president in those cases. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:30 am by Gritsforbreakfast
She exercised her pocket-veto power, a prerogative of committee chairs, and refused to set the bill for a hearing. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The operative contributes $25k to the fundraiser and pockets $75k. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 2:30 pm
,Since the pocket veto (last heard about in your high school senior civics class) is causing some political waves for President Bush, see In Surprise Step, Bush Vows Veto of Military Bill, and the bill was passed overwhelmingly by both the Senate and the House, it seems quite likely that after the first of the year everything will be worked out and the expansion will go through.But as Dan says, "it's fair to say that this situation is fluid. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
His most noted opinion was in the so-called Pocket Veto case, in which he ended a 140-year-old dispute by ruling that the president has 10 calendar, rather than legislative, days to act on a bill before the adjournment of Congress. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Barnes (1987) is instructive: That case involved a challenge to President Reagan’s pocket veto by members of Congress. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:11 am by Jay Stanley
Our pockets and bags simply aren’t big enough to carry paper records revealing that much data. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:26 pm by Ryan Singel
Brown will veto the bill, known as SB 914, as a favor to law enforcement. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:47 am by Eugene Volokh
” It takes an affirmative veto, or the adjournment of the session before ten days elapse (a so-called “pocket veto”), to stop the bill from becoming law. [read post]