Search for: "Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Electronics Corp."
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
The factors for assessing confusion are set out in Polaroid Corp v Polarad Electronics Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961) and include the strength of the mark, the degree of similarity of the marks, the degree of similarity of the products, the likelihood that the senior user would expand, actual confusion, the defendant’s motive and good faith, the quality of the defendant’s product, the sophistication of the buyer class. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 7:27 pm
Originally adapted from Polaroid Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:11 pm
Applying the factors set out in Polaroid Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:17 pm
Polarad Electronics Corp., 287 F.2d 492, 495 (2nd Cir.) cert. denied, 368 U.S. 820 (1961). [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Polarad Electronics, Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961), or, as we say in the Third Circuit, “factors suggesting that the consuming public might . . . [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:52 am
Polarad Electronics, Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961). [read post]
