Search for: "Polaroid Corp. v. Polaroid Electronics Corp."
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 3:24 pm
Zenith also states that it previously filed suit in the Eastern District of Texas (Zenith Electronics Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
The factors for assessing confusion are set out in Polaroid Corp v Polarad Electronics Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961) and include the strength of the mark, the degree of similarity of the marks, the degree of similarity of the products, the likelihood that the senior user would expand, actual confusion, the defendant’s motive and good faith, the quality of the defendant’s product, the sophistication of the buyer class. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 7:27 pm
Originally adapted from Polaroid Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:11 pm
Applying the factors set out in Polaroid Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:17 pm
In New York, the Second Circuit uses the factors that were set forth in Polaroid Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
KG v President of Gernamn Patent- und Markenamt (IPKat) Geobra Brandstätter assert copyright against vicar Pfarrer Markus Bomhard for using ‘deformed’ Playmobil figurines to depict biblical scenes (IPKat) (The IP Factor) Bundesgerichtshof on when a trade mark is distinctive enough to qualify for registration: STREETBALL case (Class 46) Still no infringement of Tuc cracker shape, says German appellate court (Class 46) Greece Well-known MOUYER trade… [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Polarad Electronics, Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961), or, as we say in the Third Circuit, “factors suggesting that the consuming public might . . . [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:52 am
Polarad Electronics, Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
</span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <br/> </span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <span style="display: initial;"> Some well-known patent infringement </span> </span> <a href="https://www.greyb.com/largest-patent-infringement-awards/" target="_blank"… [read post]
