Search for: "Polisher v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2015, 6:57 am by Jeremy Morley
"The order dated February 12th 2015 by Justice David Price of the Superior Court in Ontario in Nowacki v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Riccardo Calzavara, Arden Chambers
The Court of Appeal was bound by the decisions in Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] 1 WLR 2602 and Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310; [2009] PTSR 897. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 am
The parents are Polish and had three children, now aged 15, 13 and 10. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
 This was - in a nutshell - the issue on which the Polish Supreme Court had sought guidance from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in OTK v SFP, C-367/15.This morning, contrary to the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston, the CJEU answered in the negative, holding that [para 28] "the fact that Directive 2004/48 does not entail an obligation on the Member States to provide for ‘punitive’ damages… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
He stated (at paragraph 39) that: "the only principle to be extracted from Payne v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 7:18 pm
 Today I polished up and filed the brief in the Campbell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 2:40 am
The Court of Justice yesterday held that a Polish excise duty on second-hand vehicles was incompatible with Article 90 EC in so far as it affected vehicles imported from another member state more onerously than those already registered in Poland.Polish law provided that excise duty applied to the acquisition of second-hand vehicles originating from other Member States but not to the acquisition of second-hand vehicles already registered in Poland, these vehicles already… [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:13 am by H. Scott Leviant
Rules of Court, rule 8.548), we agreed to answer the following question:  Does the federal Fair Labor Standards Act’s de minimis doctrine, as stated in Anderson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm by Allard Knook
The Court reiterated that apprehension of internal difficulties in the course of implementing a decision on State aid could not justify a failure by a Member State to comply with its obligations under Community law (Case C-52/95 Commission v France [1995]; Case C-265/95 Commission v France [1997]; and Case C-441/06 Commission v France [2007]). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:37 am
Human rights and democratic constitutionalism entail not only changes of the ‘rules of recognition’ (IV) and require ‘judicial balancing’ as the ‘ultimate rule of law’ (V). [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:35 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a detailed 6-page order, issued by Presiding Justice McConnell and filed on August 25, 2020, the Fourth District Court of Appeal denied three petitions for rehearing, and “polished up” its lengthy published opinion filed at the end of last month in Golden Door Properties, LLC et al v. [read post]