Search for: "Polite v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 24,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2023, 8:32 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States – Navigating Between ‘Politics As Usual’ and Sacks of Cash (Forthcoming, Yale Law Journal Forum) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:06 am by traceydennis
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; SM (Zimbabwe) v Same; AM (Zimbabwe) v Same; DM (Zimbabwe) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 1285; [2010] WLR (D) 295 “A claim for asylum would not be defeated if the tribunal found that a claimant would be willing to lie about political beliefs, or about the absence of political beliefs, but that the reason for the lie was to avoid persecution. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 4:09 am
States and political subdivisions of states are not employers within the meaning of the National Labor Relations ActFord v D.C. 37 Union Local 1549, CA2d Circuit, Docket No. 08-2317-cvRoxanne Ford appealed a judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New dismissing her complaint alleging that DC-37 breached the duty of fair representation.Ford, however, had filed her claims against DC-37 pursuant to the federal Labor… [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 11:45 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
” The post State Redistricting Under Gaffney v Cummings appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
30 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The post Political Speech Under Burson v Freeman appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm by John Floyd
  In July 2022, the American Bar Association weighed in on the internecine legal warfare between political activist attorneys and state bar associations this way:   “In June 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Janus v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Within a few years, the issue had produced a constitutional crisis, famously acted out in the Supreme Court’s determination that states were subject to suit, Chisholm v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:01 am by Walter Olson
A mini-roundup: “How State Pension Funds — and 401k Managers — Prioritize Politics over Returns” [Ike Brannon, Cato/Forbes.com; related, Eric V. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:31 am
United States Supreme Court to rule on State's ban on use of union fees for political activityYsursa v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J stated that “(i) The statement must be recognisable as comment, as distinct from an imputation of fact. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:58 am by Jonathan
Illegal in both the State and Federal criminal justice systems, drug crimes have come to the forefront of national debate and are at the center of political disagreement. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:32 am
In January 2010, decades of legal precedent were overturned when the Supreme Court, in Citizens United v. [read post]