Search for: "Polly v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited & Ors (Pretty Polly Limited); and Baker v Quantum… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:34 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on the grant comes from Andrew Pollis at PrawfsBlawg and from Donald Falk and Archis Parasharami at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 7:30 am by Eugene Volokh
An excerpt from yesterday's very long Tenth Circuit panel opinion in Baca v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard… [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1824, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Gibbons v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by INFORRM
  This was resolved by the Court of Appeal in Polly Peck (Holdings) plc v Trelford [1986] QB 1000, with O’Connor LJ stating (with unanimous approval): “In my judgment section 5 plainly requires the distinct charges against the plaintiff to be founded on separate words, and these must be contained in the passages of which the plaintiff complains. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Conversely, say Polly Plaintiff wants to sue Donna Defendant for discrimination based on Polly's mental illness, but is reasonably fearful that disclosing the mental illness would ruin her future employment prospects. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Conversely, say Polly Plaintiff wants to sue Donna Defendant for discrimination based on Polly's mental illness, but is reasonably fearful that disclosing the mental illness would ruin her future employment prospects. [read post]