Search for: "Ponder v. Prophete"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2019, 10:01 am
I'm very sympathetic to the argument that the current legal standard may allow speculative ideas to be patented too early—I've argued in prior work that all the competing policy considerations raised by Pierson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:59 pm
Charles Boulakia then emphasised that, for the prophetic example to support validity, the prophetic example must nonetheless actually work. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:06 am
West, by his action on the steps of the Supreme Court, is asking us to stop and ponder. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
I made this argument in Where Do the Prophets Stand? [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
” Thus, we’ve had a quarter-century to ponder such questions. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 9:47 pm
" State v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionThe Symposium raises two large themes, with many variations. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
Sutton of Columbus, Ohio, nevertheless laid down a challenge for the Supreme Court to ponder when the controversy reached that level. “The Court,” he wrote, “should stop saying that a meaningful limit on Congress’s commerce powers exists or prove that it is so.” It is fairly easy to argue (though some do debate it) that the individual mandate is a proper policy initiative to test whether there is such a limit, because of its unique nature and… [read post]
