Search for: "Pool v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 3:15 pm
The case will now return to the Superior Court for a new trial. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:18 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, et al, the California Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s decision that classified a class of delivery drivers as employees rather than independent contractors, as Dynamex had been classifying them. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:36 am
The borrower challenged the sale in the Superior Court which ruled against her. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
In Brandecker v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
The Superior Court ruled in Kent’s favor and upheld the Ordinance, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. [read post]
31 May 2010, 4:07 am
In Smith v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
The reason I think so is that no one could stand up inside those organizations and put forward a superior plan. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:08 am
The court’s opinion in Poole v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:49 am
(See Pool v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:23 pm
" In Atkins v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:40 pm
Maloney, case # 56-2016-00479026-PR-TR-OXN, Ventura County Superior Court [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:40 pm
Maloney, case # 56-2016-00479026-PR-TR-OXN, Ventura County Superior Court [read post]
31 May 2021, 7:34 pm
EPCON Homestead, LLC v Town of Chapel Hill, 2021 WL 2138630 (MD NC 5/26/2021) [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 7:38 pm
The Court of Appeal in Gentry v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 11:07 am
The Superior Court opinion coming down today in Reich v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
Superior Court, 30 Cal.4th 278, 285 (2003) (affirming that only the county can provide for compensation of employees); Valdez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
He lost in Superior Court. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:39 am
Now, these same employers should take note of the recent decision by the Seventh Circuit in Ervin v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:40 am
Superior Court (Volkswagen Group of America), No. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:27 am
The Superior Court rejected this argument based on two provisions in the Verizon Policy. [read post]
