Search for: "Port v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2014, 8:29 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 10:45 am
Here are the briefs in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of… [read post]
New York-New Jersey Port Authority held subject to New York State's laws involving health and safety
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
New York-New Jersey Port Authority held subject to New York State's laws involving health and safety
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:56 am
Regina (Boahen) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2010] EWCA Civ 585; [2010] WLR (D) 143 “An immigration officer at the port of entry had discretionary power to cancel a visa granted overseas on the ground that the purpose of the visit was not same as stated in the visa granted and to refuse leave to enter the UK. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:20 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
United States Department of Transportation et al., several environmental groups challenged the DOT’s approval of a license for commercial construction and operation of the Sea Port Oil Terminal, alleging violations of the Deepwater Port Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:18 pm
The post From the shores of New York Harbor, a scuffle over port security and state sovereignty appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:11 am
Case citation: Massachusetts Port Authority v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 8:14 am
The Court stated that even if the Master’s navigation had been found to be negligent, it would still have concluded that the port’s unsafety remained the real and effective cause of the casualty. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:02 pm
In Lexion Medical, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:41 pm
The Castle v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
Port Authority’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and TRO: pa-brief-in-support-of-renewed-pi-and-troDownload On February 10, the Blackfeet Nation filed a Response in Support of the Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order: blackfeet-response-in-support-of-pi-and-troDownload Brief in Response: ecf-25-ds-response-to-pi-and-troDownload The Blackfeet Nation intervened in the case, arguing that the State of Montana… [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:14 am
On January 14, 2020, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Kelly v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:41 am
Here are the new materials in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
In Nash v. [read post]
