Search for: "Portman v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2017, 8:45 am
Nothing in this section shall be construed to impair the enforcement or limit the application of section 1595 of title 18, United States Code The added language to Section 230(e)(1) and the new Section 230(e)(5) would expose Internet services to countless new enforcement actions by state law enforcement and civil plaintiffs. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
In Jane Doe No. 1 v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Natural Resources Defense v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
LEXIS 19627February 25, 2011, DecidedFebruary 28, 2011, Filed LINDA PORTMAN, PLAINTIFF v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:28 am
United States, 2020 WL 398625 (D.C. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:26 am
In April 2010, the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri denied the reinsurers’ motion. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:54 am
United States, the ongoing constitutional challenge to FOSTA/SESTA. 5. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
To prevent foreign countries from bullying U.S. businesses into these compulsory boycotts, the EAA prohibited U.S. companies from entering into agreements with foreign governments to boycott countries friendly to the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
* United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
United States, 2023 WL 4376244 (D.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:30 am
(Bell v Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, ¶ 17.) [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:20 pm
United States, Celebrities, Immigration, LSAC, LSAT, Mitt Romney, Non-Sequiturs, Politics, Republican Nomination, Rob Portman, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, University of Michigan Law School [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:30 pm
First, the Portman-Heitkamp Regulatory Accountability Act builds on a set of consensus-driven recommendations from the American Bar Association (ABA) and the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am
Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reported on the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
This was one of the United States’ stated objectives for NAFTA. [read post]
