Search for: "Portugal v. Portugal (Complete Opinion)"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 7:55 am
It’s complete speculation, of course – I hope you’d know better than to expect more of me – but perhaps the Court chucked them over to the next Conference so it could consider them alongside Latif v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:29 pm
(If you won't believe me, then read Richard Posner's great opinion in Walker v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm
However, the Bucharest County Court dismissed the defamation proceedings, holding that Macovei had ‘expressed her opinion’ on a ‘matter of public interest,’ and her criticism had been ‘directed at politicians’. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:06 pm
However, this idea of completely stripping the performance of all meaning and context does not seem consistent with the Court’s case law. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
In fact, Italy, Greece, Portugal and Poland use government agencies to make such orders. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
In Monteiro da Costa Noqueira v Portugal (Judgment of 11 January 2011, in French only) the Second Section considered another criminal defamation cases. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
The IPKat (see post on 13 July last, on Case C-61/05) recalls that Portugal got taken apart by the ECJ not so very long ago on a similar issue and doubts that the Court will take a different view vis-à -vis Ireland.On Thursday 18 January the Advocate General gives an Opinion in Case C-17/06 Sarl Céline v SA Céline, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Nancy, France. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:32 pm
Helpful Links Kinsley, et al., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
It seems that the Opinion of Advocate-General Bot in the context of the Spanish proceedings fails to comprehensively address some serious questions regarding the regulation’s conformity with article 118 TFEU. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
In Monteiro da Costa Noqueira v Portugal (Judgment of 11 January 2011, in French only) the Second Section considered another criminal defamation cases. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
In Google Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm
The suspicion is (in my opinion) greatly exaggerated, but is real. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Website blocking is a legitimate tool used by many free and democratic countries that support an open Internet including England, France, Portugal, and Italy to block a variety of websites that disseminate illegal content such as child pornography, malware, investment fraud, terrorism, personal information, counterfeiting, and copyright infringement.[4] The jurisdiction to make such orders has been available throughout the EU since 2001 and has been used to block a… [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
In the Council’s opinion, repeated incidents of different forms of financial crime reflect a company’s ability to prevent, detect and deal with corruption. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
These include: (1) consulting with and counseling citizens: (2) preparing letters, legal memoranda and other documents; (3) meeting with public and private officials; (4) and organizing, participating in, and/or attending public meetings.Clinical students must complete and document twelve hours of clinical work per week during the semester, in addition to class meeting time. [read post]
