Search for: "Post v. Jones"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2011, 6:22 am
Margaret Hu, a visiting assistant professor at Duke Law School, has posted over at the ACS blog on U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:13 pm
Samuel V. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:50 am
Jones. [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:14 am
Griffin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
For such a short and unanimous opinion, Jones v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
John Coates reports on an amicus brief filed by 25 law professors in the Jones v. harris case pending before the SCOTUS:The Harris case is an appeal of the Seventh Circuit, in an opinion written by Judge Frank Easterbrook, noted previously on this blog here and here. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 7:37 am
Here is the abstract: In Bob Jones v. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
A brief note on the recent House of Lords decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:06 am
This week, Cybercrime Review is featuring a series of posts that takes a look at how federal and state courts are applying the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:38 pm
Ameriprise and in Jones v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 1:44 pm
First up, a Jones Act case from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Harrisson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:04 am
Case citation: Jones v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Let's explore this question by looking at some of the pleadings filed in Jones v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 5:01 am
See Jones v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
QUINTON ANDREW JONES, Defendant. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:53 am
Jones, no. 10-1259, last week. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
