Search for: "Post v. Lunney"
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
" Lunney v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
You can also read the article in PDF, or read all the posts that have been posted so far on this thread; but in this post, I excerpt the start of the policy analysis. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:45 am
US v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 12:37 pm
Lunney: are these recent v. historical? [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Atari v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Allows estates to post and speak as if they are the decedent. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:44 am
See Lunney v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am
Lunney, etc. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:15 pm
Oracle (fka Oracle v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
Bank v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:22 pm
Gordon doesn’t agree w/how far Lunney takes her argument, but that’s ok. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
[A couple of thoughts, overlapping with the others: Glynn Lunney’s piece for this conference is all about responding to the restitutionary impulse. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm
[I wish Glynn Lunney were here.]Hatfield: Downward economic pressure that free access places on the entire ecosystem for creating music. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
Source Perrier v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:02 pm
Lunney: we have a group of elites making a lot of $; his concern is for the average artist. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm
[See Glynn Lunney on this Q in IP law generally, not on norms.]Q: interesting work on architecture—fan fiction sites where the sharing models are designed by women, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
The post Friday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
[Wacky Packages]Lunney: is it ok to garrote the demand for something through criticism, a la Campbell v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
There are pockets that demand different approaches.Jake Linford: Error costs v. administrative costs. [read post]
