Search for: "Post v. Pearson"
Results 121 - 140
of 323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 5:03 am
" This latter fact has important implications for a problem that the Supreme Court apparently intends to revisit when it hears Pearson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:06 pm
Meal and rest break requirements clarified in Brinker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Cynthia Godsoe and Kim Pearson discuss last week’s decision in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 5:30 pm
Total posts on the LexBlog Network today: 160. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
The virtues of the criminal law revolve around fair trials, but the criminal law is less restrained when it comes to offence definition as well as the pre- and post-trial stages of the criminal process. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:55 am
(33) Kansas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Courts of Appeals hold; and (2) whether the Supreme Court should reconsider Pearson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
This post examines a recent opinion from the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 1:10 am
COURT OF APPEALSSECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeResentencing Under 2000 Guidelines Required; Use of 2002 Guidelines Violated Ex Post Facto Clause United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
Pearson, 33 M.J. 777 (N.M.C.M.R. 1991), United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:40 am
" (citing In re Pearson). [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:10 am
In a post-trial hearing for a new trial, the trial court found that Juror 2 committed misconduct. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:39 am
” At the Wisconsin Appellate Law Blog, Eric Pearson discusses the Court’s summary reversal in Maryland v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:45 pm
Constitution by restricting state legislatures’ prerogative to post-election certification of Presidential electors. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
On Friday 10 November 2023, there was a hearing in the misuse of private information case of Pearson and others v Harpin KB-2023-004119. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm
My apologies for the light posting this week as unexpectedly I was gaveled out to trial.As always, thanks for reading. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Pearson v. [read post]