Search for: "Post v. Pearson" Results 121 - 140 of 311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
 Eric Goldman explains well in this 2009 post about another case Pearson and other publishers brought at the same time, Pearson Education, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
A finding of 100% contributory negligence should never be made: see Part III.G.i. [13] Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (UK), SI 1998/3132, r 44.3(2)(a). [14] Onay v Brown [2009] EWCA Civ 775; Sonmez v Kebabery Wholesale Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1386. [15] Maes Finance Ltd v AL Phillips & Co (1997) The Times, 25 March (Ch D); Lunnun v Singh (1999) The Times, 19 July (CA). [16] See, eg, Pankhurst v White [2006] EWHC 2093 (QB). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Think Twice Before Removing the Copyright Notice–It Could breach the DMCA http://t.co/mtoUDG7iSL -> Delhi HC dismisses http://t.co/opHBnyh3Wa's Copyright Infringement plea after Trial http://t.co/nWwAkWDU6j -> Facebook Posting That Someone Has Herpes Is Criminal Harassment–Pennsylvania v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am by Dan Stein
” At PrawfsBlawg, Kim Pearson writes about family law issues in response to comments on her series of posts (covered in both Monday’s and Tuesday’s round-ups) with Addie Rolnick on last week’s decision in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:04 pm by Addie Rolnick
In response to some of the comments received on our series about the Baby Girl case (posted on Prawfs earlier this week; the final post, with links to the others, is here), my co-author Kim Pearson addresses some of the family law issues: Our original posts elided the issue of the mother’s rights to make decisions about the child, and several of the comments pointed out her invisibility. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At PrawfsBlawg, Cynthia Godsoe and Kim Pearson posted the last part of a four-part series discussing the decision. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am by Marissa Miller
At PrawfsBlawg, Cynthia Godsoe and Kim Pearson discuss last week’s decision in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am by Addie Rolnick
(Similar concerns surrounded the use of ancestry in Rice v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:12 am by Addie Rolnick
During my last guest stint here, I addressed this phenomenon in posts about the widely-debated Santa Clara Pueblo v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
There were a handful of resolved cases reported:  Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]