Search for: "Potter v. Potter" Results 141 - 160 of 1,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:40 pm
NEW YORK — The decision in the Harry Potter case might well still be a few weeks coming, but in the meantime we’ve got another cool copyright case to keep us busy. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:22 am
The Telegraph today reports upon Miss Berkeley's appeal, which went before the Court of Appeal, including Sir Mark Potter, yesterday. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:37 am
The Plain Dealer reports that on Monday, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Tepper v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 6:51 am by Broc Romanek
Another Appraisal Opinion John Grossbauer of Potter Anderson notes: Last week, Delaware Vice Chancellor Parsons issued this opinion in Merion Capital v. 3M Cogent. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:14 am by Broc Romanek
Delaware Chancery Court's Groundbreaking Decision: "Brokers" as Recordholders Here is some news from John Grossbauer of Potter Anderson: Last Tuesday, Delaware Vice Chancellor Laster delivered a potentially important opinion in Kurz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:56 am by Peter Landers
Justice Stewart’s line “I know it when I see it” came in a concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The story of Warner Bros v RDR Books - the Harry Potter Lexicon case - provides a vehicle to examine the conundrum. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Bill Moyers' Journal on 4 Sept 09 had a debate of sorts between Trevor Potter and Floyd Abrams over issues surrounding Citizens United v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:52 am
In Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
Speaking on a recent edition of BBC Radio 4’s “Media Show”, Professor Roy Greenslade predicted that Lord Justice Leveson will probably recommend “some kind of statutory regulation” of the press at the end of his inquiry. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:05 pm
In a shocking -- shocking -- development, the Ninth Circuit this morning held that the possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking is not protected by the Second Amendment.Yet another example of the wacky, uber-left Ninth Circuit going out of its way to undermine the core constitutional rights of American citizens. [read post]