Search for: "Potter v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
Sir Mark Potter and Sedley LJ concurred. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm
” Again, in Dudley Fleming v Chief Constable of Sussex [2004] EWCA Civ 643, Potter LJ observed at paragraph 36: “The principles are too well known to require to be set out in detail. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 8:12 am
The SCOV goes one step further, and notes defendant’s argument that the court erred under State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 7:38 am
” What constitutes a “reasoned decision” is difficult to put into an exact definition (I am reminded of the old definition of pornography as stated by Supreme Court Justice, Potter Stewart, “I know it when I see it”). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:07 am
Potter [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:12 pm
Here is a CNN piece on United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
The Union County Board of County Commissioners is hosting Gibbons v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:51 pm
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals decided on Thompson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:51 pm
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals decided on Thompson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 3:00 pm
Potter (06-1321). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 2:07 am
These are the words of the 6th Circuit from earlier this week in Chen v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:41 am
Case scheduled Dec 04, 2013 10:00 a.m. at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Howard T. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
Wong v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:26 am
Potter, 2004 EEOPUB LEXIS 448 (Feb. 3, 2004) (holding that the settlement agreement between the parties, which included a no‐rehire provision, was enforceable); Jablonski v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
On Thursday 4th May the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 679. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:20 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
