Search for: "Potts v. Potts" Results 101 - 120 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 7:30 am
Two fishermen, Seth Smith and Bruce Potts, survived and were picked up by F/V PATTY AJ. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:11 pm
Says Monica Potts in The American Prospect (a liberal publication): [The lawsuit is based on Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:02 am by war
Thus, in Watson, Laidlaw & Co Ltd v Pott, Cassels and Williamson (1914) 31 RPC 104, Lord Shaw expressed the principle: wherever an abstraction or invasion of property has occurred, then, unless such abstraction or invasion were to be sanctioned by law, the law ought to yield a recompense under the category or principle, as I say, of price or hire. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:47 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)Bajwa & Ors, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1093 (06 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2011] EWCA Civ 526 (06 May 2011) C (A Child), Re [2011] EWCA Civ 521 (06 May 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)Potts v Densley & Anor [2011] EWHC 1144 (QB) (06 May 2011) Bacon v Automattic Inc & Ors [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) (06 May 2011)High Court (Chancery… [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:54 am by David Smith
Potts v Densley & Anor [2011] EWHC 1144 (QB) Another case on tenancy deposit protection has hit the High Court, with a rather strange outcome. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:54 am by David Smith
Potts v Densley & Anor [2011] EWHC 1144 (QB) Another case on tenancy deposit protection has hit the High Court, with a rather strange outcome. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:03 am by John Day
    Read the opinion in Rotech Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:05 pm by David Smith
An appeal with similar facts (Potts v Densley) is on the warned list in the High Court in the week commencing 7 February and Hashemi v Gladehurst which also has this point as an issue is listed for a hearing before the Court of Appeal on 22 or 23 March. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:05 pm by David Smith
An appeal with similar facts (Potts v Densley) is on the warned list in the High Court in the week commencing 7 February and Hashemi v Gladehurst which also has this point as an issue is listed for a hearing before the Court of Appeal on 22 or 23 March. [read post]