Search for: "Powell v. AT" Results 41 - 60 of 2,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Gerry W. Beyer
Akers recently published an Article entitled, Estate of Powell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:26 pm
Powell, Jr., which is forthcoming in the Santa Clara Law Review. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
This appeal from the Court of Appeal, where it was known as Salford CC v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, was heard on 23-24 November and concerns the applicability of ECHR, art 8, to mandatory possession proceedings brought by local authorities in two contexts, namely: introductory tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V (Frisby [...] [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:26 pm by Steve Vladeck
This Friday, I’ll be joining Benjamin Powell from WilmerHale (and formerly, inter alia, the General Counsel of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence) for a Federalist Society teleforum on Clapper v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 5:04 pm
  Here is the abstract:Suppose that you were Colin Powell. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Sara Mayeux, a Sharswood Fellow at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, has posted Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Before Powell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Wells Bennett
The White Paper (correctly) invoked the Hamdi v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:55 pm by Lovechilde
Perhaps the most infamous example of how corporate power has been advanced through the strategies seeded by Powell is last year’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:08 pm
Bradley and Carlos Vázquez, and essays by Julian Mortenson, Catherine Powell, Campbell McLachlan, and John Torpey. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 4:01 pm
 Check the Florida v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:37 am
This decision is the long awaited sequel to Manchester CC v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2010] 3 WLR 1441 (case comment here) where a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court held (in the context of demoted tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V, Ch 1A) that where a local authority bring possession proceedings relying [...] [read post]