Search for: "Powell v. Powell"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2019, 12:37 am
London and Quadrant HR v Patrick [2019] EWHC 1263 (QB) follows hard on the footsteps of Powell v Dacorum BC [2019] EWCA Civ 29 and Forward v Aldwyck Housing Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 24 (QB) (our note here), with Turner J making some fairly caustic observations about the use of the public sector equality duty in possession cases. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 3:04 am
Here’s an excerpt from this blog by Lane & Powell’s Doug Greene: This year will be remembered as the year of the Super Bowl of securities litigation, Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:00 pm
In Ethridge v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:17 pm
Powell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 8:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Today’s decision in Powell goes some way towards resolving that quandary. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
In Powell v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 10:41 am
A week after his confirmation, and one week before his swearing in, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Powell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:10 am
Just Security is delighted to announce the release of the first book in our partnership with Oxford University Press (OUP), Race and National Security, edited by Matiangai V. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
"I'm not so sure that this is true, and I didn't have to strain to come up with a counter-example: Felix Frankfurter, appointed by FDR, voted to uphold the expulsion of Jehovah's Witnesses who refused to pledge the flag at school; voted with the minority in Baker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:08 pm
The APA has just selected the hundreds of clinicians and scientists who will develop the DSM-V. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
In Powell v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
Powell alerted Corporal Thomas Trusal to his findings. . . . [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:21 am
The syllabus: In a pathmarking decision, Miranda v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 5:14 pm
The Supreme Court decided that when a non-violent felon is ordered to stop and submit to police, ignoring that order does not give rise to a reasonable good-faith belief that the use of deadly force is necessary, unless it has been threatened.Justice White was joined by Justices Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, and Stevens.Justice O'Connor wrote the dissent and was joined by Justices Burger and Rehnquist.One local connection -- former UM Law Professor, Steve Winter, argued for… [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:10 am
., L.L.C. v Zurich Am. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:21 am
That case is United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
In this week’s case (Racy v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
