Search for: "Powers v. Chase Bank USA, N.A." Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2011, 5:34 pm
Chase Bank USA, N.A., Chase bank gave plaintiff Barbee Lyon incorrect information about the basis for a $645 charge on his credit card bill. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:00 am by Daniel O'Rielly
Chase Bank USA, N.A., which held that the NBA and former regulation 12 C.F.R. 7.4008(d) preempt section 1748.9. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:17 am
Chase Bank USA, N.A. (9th Cir. 2008) 513 F.3d 1032), which on near-identical facts held that federal law preempted section 1748.9 as applied to national banks. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
And the credit card account at issue in Madden was presumably one of those, because the 2d Circuit opinion in Madden v Midland mentions a notice-of-change-in-terms that changed the choice-of-law state to Delaware, FIA's home state.Exemplar of Bank of America N.A. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:01 am by Jon Robinson
  In January of 2011, the Court decided Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:01 am by Jon Robinson
In January of 2011, the Court decided Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi and others (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants), heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq… [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under this principle, “[i]t is not necessary that the precise legal theories presented in the first action also be presented in the second action” (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Luxama, 172 AD3d 1341 [2d Dept 2019]), so long as both suits “aris[e] out of the same subject matter or series of alleged wrongs” (JFK Family Ltd. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  Defendants had no in-state offices, real estate, were not registered to do business, had no address, phone numbers, bank accounts, or employees.Google Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Haraburda Case Number: 15-cv-01903 (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida) Date Filed: August 17, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 20, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-147 In the Matter of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and J.P. [read post]