Search for: "Powers v. Clayton et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:53 am
Cardinal Health, Inc., et al.[1], has further confused the analysis of the lawfulness of bundled discounts by allowing a bundling claim to proceed under Section 1 of the Sherman Act (challenged as an exclusive dealing claim) and Section 3 of the Clayton Act (as a tying claim), even though it found that the defendants lacked market power and the discount programs failed to foreclose a sufficient portion of the relevant market. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm
SanDisk Corporation, et al., United States District Court, ND Cal., Case No. 5:10-CV02787-JF/HRL, the court denied a motion to dismiss in a Walker Process "fraud on patent office" case, and allowed standing to a direct purchaser. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
In Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
In Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:16 am
Nestlé S.A. et al. is a distributer of ice cream in Puerto Rico. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
PEPPER ET AL., case number 17-204, the United States Supreme Court considered a case alleging Apple has monopolized the retail market for the sale of apps and has unlawfully used its monopolistic power to charge consumers higher-than competitive prices. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
Judge Jackson has ordered the parties in National Association of Manufacturers, et al, v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 8:04 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al., No. 18-107. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
Clayton County, Georgia; Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
FEC and Vermont Right to Life Committee, et al v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:01 am
[See Illinois Brick Company et al., v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 11:22 pm
Here are the two documents (followed by further commentary):Dante deMartini et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Rev. 609 (1998) READ 620-636 Supreme Court of the United StatesRoy ROMER, Governor of Colorado, et al., Petitioners,v.Richard G. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of iRunway India Private, Ltd.Amicus brief of Law ProfessorsAmicus brief of the TPL Group et al. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Harper, et al., The Law of Torts §§ 25.1, at 493 (2d ed. 1986)] (‘Harper’). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Adam Ellithorpe, et al. v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
