Search for: "Powers v. Com" Results 21 - 40 of 529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
  It was suspicious of markets, of bottom up unsupervised economic activity, and of trade arrangements that did not put development at the center of inter-governmental management, and that the behaviors of developed states (especially the old imperial powers) were necessary exploitative according to the "logic" of post 1945 globalization. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
By Wyatt Fore   [Draft] Guideline 12: Acquisitions of partial control or common ownership may in some situations substantially lessen competition.[1]   Portfolio investors may soon find that their investments could be the subject of increased antitrust scrutiny, resulting from new federal enforcement guidelines. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
And thus the elements of revival and the continuing power of the narratives of the 1950s-1970s outside of OECD states. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In the decade between 1990 and 2000, there were 4,194 IPOs by U.S. operating companies.[5] In the two decades from 2001 to 2021, there were only 2,276 IPOs.[6] As a securities attorney in private practice from 1995 to 2004, I saw first-hand the ups and downs of the IPO market and the burst of the dot-com bubble.[7] There are a number of potential factors for the decline in IPOs. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
By Lisa Sotto and Sam Grogan Data is the fuel that powers the metaverse, and with those data-driven opportunities come a host of privacy and security issues. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 2:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
From the WIPO Arbitration & Mediation Center Administrative Panel Decision in Polanski v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[24] As private companies have gained increasingly large market power and as the pool of accredited investors has expanded – including venture capital, private equity funds, mutual funds, pension funds, and individuals that meet the requisite wealth thresholds – the de facto presumption that accredited investors need no disclosure isn’t panning out. [read post]