Search for: "Powers v. Common Council" Results 1 - 20 of 1,325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2010, 3:01 am by traceydennis
Salford City Council v Mullen: Hounslow London Borough Council v Hall; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby; Manchester City Council v Mushin (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 336; [2010] WLR (D) 91  ”Guidance for county courts hearing applications for possession orders by local authority landlords of non-secure tenancies… [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The recent decision in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) is a worrying one both for Defendants and for the legal profession generally. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am by DR PAUL DALY, QUEENS' COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE
In Dover District Council v CPRE Kent [2017] UKSC 79, Lord Carnwath offered some important observations on the duty to give reasons in administrative law. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Mayor sought to invalidate Resolution R20-78, which was passed by the Common Council and authorized the Common Council to retain its own counsel in a dispute with the Mayor over the separation of powers between the Mayor and the Common Council. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Mayor sought to invalidate Resolution R20-78, which was passed by the Common Council and authorized the Common Council to retain its own counsel in a dispute with the Mayor over the separation of powers between the Mayor and the Common Council. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 3:53 am
This is its reaction to the European Court of Justice's ruling in the Commission v Council case in 2005. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 10:59 am
The Court of Justice handed down an important judgment in Case C-133/06 Parliament v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
The first, handed down on 21 May 2014, was R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council & Anor [2014] UKSC 31; the second was R (Newhaven Port and Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council & Anor [2015] UKSC 7, which was handed down on 25 February 2015. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:38 am
 Further, although no law explicitly permits unincorporated associations to enter into contracts, the Court indicated that this is a long-recognized and uncontroversial power (see Miller v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:43 am by Tom Pritchard
  Counsel presented case law that the ordinary meaning of the words and legislative history supported a broad interpretation of the phrase (Hobbs v Winchester Corpn [1910] 2 KB 471, Place v Rawtenstall Corpn (1916) 86 LJKB 90, Clayton v Sale Urban District Council [1926] 1 KB 415 and Neath Rural District Council v Williams [1951] 1 KB 115). [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
She sought to be re-housed by Wycombe District Council, who told her that she would not be re-housed whilst she held a tenancy with Dacorum. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:33 am by Siobhan Hayes
Here we update on the most recent cases - the trend of decisions favouring applicants for registration seems to continue, sometimes with surprising results.Beaches as Common Land The Court of Appeal in Newhaven Port and Properties Limited v East Sussex County Council ruled that a tidal beach was registrable as a town or village green. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:33 am by Siobhan Hayes
Here we update on the most recent cases - the trend of decisions favouring applicants for registration seems to continue, sometimes with surprising results.Beaches as Common Land The Court of Appeal in Newhaven Port and Properties Limited v East Sussex County Council ruled that a tidal beach was registrable as a town or village green. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:13 am by Rosalind English
ABB & Ors v Milton Keynes Council [2011] EWHC 2745 (QB)- read judgment Justin Levinson of 1 Crown Office Row acted for the claimants in this case. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:57 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) As I noted below, today in American Electric Power v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:06 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
Comment The case is interesting as, given the breadth of the court’s discretion in relation to costs; it is not common for costs awards to be disputed, at least not at Supreme Court level. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Assembly recalls that the European Court of Human Rights has already stated in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and others v. [read post]