Search for: "Powers v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
OpenAI published a paper in 2020, for example, outlining a scaling analysis for AI models, finding that “language modeling performance improves smoothly and predictably as we appropriately scale up model size, data, and compute”; see Kaplan, McCandlish, et. al, “Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models,” online at: 2001.08361.pdf (arxiv.org). [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The bar is a low one and the background law is favorable to true federal officers but removal is by no means automatic and is often denied. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”[22] Even if the commenter’s estimate is too high because the rule has been pared back from the proposal, the direct costs of disclosure are likely to be higher than the Commission’s estimated costs, such as the aggregate annual $16 million in professional costs for all affected filers.[23] Costs likely will be disproportionately high (and the benefits may be disproportionately low)[24] for investors in small public companies,[25] for which the Commission has… [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
This paves the way for a low-cost alternative to a traditional proxy fight. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
” —Eliezer Yudkowsky[1] Again and again, artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated its sheer power to create and tell stories by making visual art, writing poems, code, composing music, and even testing astrological compatibility.[2] Or has it? [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
Sundance Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Particular areas of focus in the agencies’ request for information are the “purpose and scope of merger review[,] presumptions that certain transactions are anticompetitive[,] use of market definition in analyzing competitive effects[,] threats to potential and nascent competition[,] impact of monopsony power, including in labor markets[, and] unique characteristics of digital markets. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The SEC’s Proposed Rule on Climate-Related Disclosures Federal financial services regulators have made clear their intention to use their regulatory power to protect market participants from alleged abuses relating to ESG. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Fourth, we explain why claims that the SEC lacks authority to mandate public-company climate-change disclosures are unwarranted. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
J. 363, 368 (2021). [8] Neiman Marcus v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
But even if a US court compels compliance, PRC authorities may not absolve the Chinese company from home country obligations. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am
Magnificence Carriers, Inc. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
