Search for: "Powers v. Quigley"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 1:51 am
by Fran Quigley, guest contributor I have a thick stack of detailed notes and a Power Point presentation, all prepared for use in teaching about the implications of the King v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Quigley v Masterson [2011] EWHC 2529 (Ch) raises an interesting point about the severance of a beneficial joint tenancy. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Quigley v Masterson [2011] EWHC 2529 (Ch) raises an interesting point about the severance of a beneficial joint tenancy. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 8:59 am
Google * Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
ADRs, Rule 10b-5 Suits, and Morrison v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:52 am
Facebook Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 10:02 am
Facebook Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
Facebook Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:52 am
Powers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:14 am
Facebook Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 9:17 am
Google * Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 11:27 pm
In contrast, Quigley v Nassau County Civil Service Commission, 153 AD2d 892, concerns a decision by a civil service commission that excluded candidates from an examination. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm
Governments often abuse their power to seek censorship via private entities, including using implied threats of retaliation for coercive effects. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
STERN v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Id.; Quigley v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
“One party supplying information to another party does not amount to joint action…the one-off, one-way communication here does not reflect ‘substantial cooperation’ or the exercise of coercive power. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Rather, in each case the court must undertake an analysis that centers on the authority under which the entity was created, the power distribution or sharing model under which it exists, the nature of its role, the power it possesses and under which it purports to act, and a realistic appraisal of its functional relationship to affected parties and constituencies’ (Smith v City Univ. of NY, 92 NY2d 707, 713 [1999])” (Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; see Snyder v… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Rather, in each case the court must undertake an analysis that centers on the authority under which the entity was created, the power distribution or sharing model under which it exists, the nature of its role, the power it possesses and under which it purports to act, and a realistic appraisal of its functional relationship to affected parties and constituencies' (Matter of Smith v City Univ. of NY, 92 NY2d 707, 713 [1999])" (Perez, 5 NY3d at 528; see Snyder… [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 am
., and Mike Quigley, D-Ill., the bill would usher in a new era of enhanced interagency cooperation to fight cruelty and uphold the proper treatment of animals. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:31 pm
But the more people who learn about law-making, the more people will participate in the process and the less likely we will have problems like this:From Powers v. [read post]