Search for: "Powers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of" Results 21 - 40 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Jeremy Graboyes
Commissioner of Social Security, which the Supreme Court decided in April. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am by Gillian Metzger
  The court’s emphasis on the significant powers of ALJs to shape the adjudicative record, regulate proceedings, and issue potentially final decisions raises questions about other instances of administrative adjudication—Social Security Agency adjudications being a prime example—when administrative judges may not have been appointed by an agency head. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, for example, ALJs within the Social Security Administration could continue to adjudicate more than half a million hearings and appeals each year. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:13 am by Vishnu Kannan
’s Investigatory Powers Commissioner ruled that MI5 retained surveillance data for too long and failed to store it safely, characterizing the handling of the data as “undoubtedly unlawful,” according to the BBC. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Commission is a securities regulator without statutory authority or expertise to address political and social issues. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 19, 2011Briscoe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
 See also pages 30-32 of the brief for former INS commissioners.) [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 11, 2011 Farris v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm by Alan B. Morrison
There is, however, another problem at the Social Security Administration: supposed variability among ALJs. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]