Search for: "Prentice v. Prentice"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 5:34 am
If you are old, nostalgic and patent-oriented, this piece of prose by Brookes Batchellor's Nick Dougan, celebrating the 50 years in IP practice which his colleague Roy Prentice has so far notched up, will give pleasure. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:17 pm
There actually is interesting information on that site, including really old photographs of really old dudes with names like Samuel Prentice and Silas Robinson and Elisha Carpenter, who, apparently sat on wooden chairs at floor level. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
In JVA Enterprises, I, LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:07 am
Plaintiff claimed that Odinist religious services were scheduled to conflict with his lunch time and his outdoor recreation time, in violation of his rights under RLUIPA and the equal protection clause.In Prentice v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 4:25 am
lang=En&n=5AE042C9-1 [v] Environment Canada. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:55 am
Prentice-Hall, Inc., 804 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.App. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
As mentioned here before, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
She represented San Francisco in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008) and Strauss v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:00 pm
On September 30, 2009, the CCA heard oral argument in the following cases:PD-1533-08, Jeffrey Rouse v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court ruled in R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, the principal laws that protect investors and preserve business integrity are (i) the Securities Act of 1933, (ii) the Securities Act of 1934, (iii) the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, (iv) the Investment Company Act of 1940, (v) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and (vi) the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:17 pm
V is for the vote swapping websites that popped up during the federal election. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:39 pm
Monitoring the Government's Response to Human Rights Judgments: Annual Report 2008"Prisoners' voting rights (Hirst v UK)47. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:42 pm
Whatever shake up is going on elsewhere is totally irrelevant to the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK (No2).Failing Bridget Prentice clarifying her answer to show the relevance of the Prisoners Votes Case to the Governance of Britain Green Paper and the Goldsmith Review, she should do the honourable thing and resign. [read post]
