Search for: "Preserve Endangered Areas v. US ARMY CORPS"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 10:58 am
Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Action 04-02091 (HHK), 2008 U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:48 am
Army Corps of Engineers, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 2163186 (9th Cir., June 1, 2010)(Circuit Judges O’Scannlain, Trott and Paez) SUMMARY: The Ninth Circuit, after considering whether the Army Corps, U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:05 pm
The Corps specifically notes that scrutiny of their process is important because of the "important resources" in the area, including ten endangered or threatened species. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) jointly prepared the 5,828-page project level EIR, defining the project as a project-level EIR for the proposed resource management plan and conservation plan project components. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:54 pm
Army Corps of Engineers to evaluate the impacts of several additional project approvals, including a resource management plan, a conservation plan for the endangered spineflower plant, a streambed alteration agreement, and two permits for the incidental take of protected species. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) for the 12,000 acre Newhall Ranch Specific Plan site. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The Court will not hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision which reversed the lower court’s ruling that the State of Texas had violated the Endangered Species Act in its administration of the state water permitting program which allegedly denied adequate amounts of fresh water at the Aransas, Texas Whooping Crane preserve. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:08 pm
We have already instructed all relevant parties to preserve any documents that may shed light on the facts surrounding this disaster. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The regulation aims to preserve stored water to protect drinking water supplies, prevent salinity intrusion and algal blooms, and minimize impacts to fisheries and the environment. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The regulation aims to preserve stored water to protect drinking water supplies, prevent salinity intrusion and algal blooms, and minimize impacts to fisheries and the environment. [read post]
