Search for: "Presley v. Attorney General" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2010, 2:46 pm by Rusty Shackleford
Supreme Court just decided an interesting case on this subject, called Presley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Upton, holding that a court of appeals failed to consider a death penalty defendant’s arguments in support of his claim that his attorney failed to investigate mitigating evidence; Presley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
Canada (Attorney General) 2011 FC 58 (Trade Mark Blog) (IPblog) Who must show consent in an intellectual property infringement case? [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV,… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
More recently, the Supreme Court decided the case of Presley v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:05 am by Michelle Yeary
  Suspicious Minds was Elvis Presley’s seventeenth and last number one hit single. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:55 am
, is in need of a generously donated Central London venue and hospitality. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm by Natasha Brunstein
Future invocations of this doctrine––which are likely to now come from Republican Attorneys General opposing Biden Administration regulations and which could once again come from the Justice Department itself in a future administration––should therefore be greeted with great skepticism. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Attorney Gen. of the US, No. 07-1799 Petition for review of a BIA order of removability is denied where petitioner's conviction for indecent assault under 18 Pa. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am by John Elwood
Summary decisions are supposed to be reserved for issues that are clear beyond peradventure; this strikes me as the summary decision that makes the most law since (Not Elvis) Presley v. [read post]