Search for: "Preston v. Preston" Results 81 - 100 of 519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Patja Howell shared the latest installment of the Culper Partners Rule of Law Series on the Lawfare Podcast, in which Nate Jones and David Kris spoke with former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick: Fogel shared a petition for rehearing en banc from the appellant in McKeever v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Ivan Preston argues that current puffery doctrine is a mistaken evolution from nineteenth-century cases involving individual buyers and sellers that held that buyers couldn’t sue for fraud based on statements that they could easily have verified or disproved themselves. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Preston (Indian Child Welfare Act – Transfer to Tribal Court)In Re.: A.G. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm by Unknown
Preston (Indian Child Welfare Act - Transfer to Tribal Court)In Re.: A.G. [read post]
” (Quoted in para 44 (v) of Lord Kerr’s judgment) In the event a decision was made on 11 July 2011 that a public inquiry would not be conducted. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:21 pm by Lev Sugarman
Peter Margulies examined the Supreme Court decision in Nielsen v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am by Anushka Limaye
And Brian Corcoran examined how Mondelez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:03 am by Scott Harman
Sarah Grant summarized the oral argument in Force v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Preston, et al (US Court of Appeals 11th Circuit, No. 17-10833 dt. 12.10.2017)In the Australian context, the Limitation Act, 2005 as applicable to Western Australia allows agreements to extend or restrict time periods. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 11:40 am by Sue Silverman
Judge Preston, who authored the decision, also notably rejected the “market substitution” assumption, an argument that was rejected by the 10th Circuit as irrational in WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]