Search for: "Price v. Brewer et al"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
Any savings to consumers from lower prices are dissipated by the cost of time lost.[28] A third consequence of price controls is an inefficient use of the limited supply of gasoline available. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:01 pm
Scott et al. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 1:01 am
[See Illinois Brick Company et al., v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
Wade et al. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Reynolds, et al. -- immunity of wholesale discount prices to challenge under Robinson-Patman Act solely because they are available to all buyers. 06-1617, Gilles v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm
” [33] However, due to the fact that the Tribune Company filed separately from the Chicago Cubs organization, the team should be clear from such action. [34] V. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Mitchell, Brewer, et al v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Alpharma, Inc., Caligor, Inc.; et al. , a 29-page, 2-1 decision, Judge Riley writes:The Kovachs raise one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court erred by entering summary judgment in favor of the Cup Defendants. [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:42 pm
Labatt Brewing Company Limited et al., 2007 Comp. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:42 pm
Labatt Brewing Company Limited et al., 2007 Comp. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Also in the US, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that watchmaker Omega's attempt to use copyright laws to block the sale of Omega watches at discounted prices by Costco will just not work - because of the 'first sale' doctrine' - and that Omega's action was also a misuse of copyright. [read post]
