Search for: "Price v. Dunn"
Results 1 - 20
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2014, 6:22 am
Supreme Court decided Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:55 am
In Price v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:24 am
One such notion -- that of a design's "individual character" -- is edging a little closer to clarification now that Advocate General Melchior Wathelet has the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) his Opinion this morning in Case C‑345/13 Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v Dunnes Stores, Dunnes Stores (Limerick) Ltd, a reference for a preliminary ruling all the way from the Supreme Court, Ireland. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 8:06 am
The patents are owned by Mr Philip Price of Preston and licensed to Mr Price's company, Surpawall. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:19 am
Supreme Court, Janus Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:11 pm
In Sharon Dunn v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:57 pm
Chevron has hired some high-priced talent to help it fight a questionable judgment down in Ecuador. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
Finally, last night in Dunn v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:12 am
The Supreme Court of the United States on Tuesday issued its opinion in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:03 am
This post is based on a Gibson Dunn client alert by Mr. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am
“1-800 Contacts is paying Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP for my time, at a rate of $1,095 an hour and the time of research staff working on this matter. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:47 am
In Dunn v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:14 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
Indeed, this has been a large part of my career, going back to my time at Gibson, Dunn and DLA Piper. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:30 pm
Browne v Dunn Rears Its Head Against this, the defendant’s case suffered from a tendency to attempt to produce inadmissible hearsay, and contravention of the ancient tripwire Browne v Dunn, a case from 1893 that requires litigants to put statements of fact to opposing witnesses in cross-examination if the litigant later intends to claim that the statement of fact contradicts the testimony of the opposing witness. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
One important point came from the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Gantler v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 3:02 am
” [John Kenneth Ross, IJ “Short Circuit”, on Mason v. [read post]
