Search for: "Price v. Georgia"
Results 181 - 200
of 558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Chamber of Commerce et al v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
McCall v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 9:40 am
Technorati Tags: credit reports, bad credit and insurance costs, Geico v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
Some may argue that just as a subsidy would allow a renewable resource to bid in a lower capacity price than it otherwise would, so too might a subsidy for a fossil resource. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
Jolly Dental paid Dental Dynamics the purchase price for this unit. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:27 am
Optigen, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Supreme Court was denied in June 2012, along with a Presbyterian case from Georgia (132 Sup.Ct. 2773)32. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:45 am
Supreme Court released its landmark decision BOSTOCK v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
BRG of Georgia (1990). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Sprint sells wireless handsets ("Phones") under the brands Sprint, Boost Mobile, Virgin Mobile, payLo and Assurance Wireless for use on Sprint's wireless network at prices significantly below the wholesale prices of the Phones so that they will be more widely accessible to consumers. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:24 am
Or as one of my research assistants put it the other day: "I think of northern Florida as an extension of southern Georgia. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:11 pm
Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 103 S. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 2:55 pm
[PennEast v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
PHA Lighting Design, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
-->-->*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->BY MARC BOURGEOISAntonio FrankoWednesday's first witness was Antonio Franko, a high school friend of Joels. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
It is worth noting, however, that the high court previously ruled that gender discrimination based on gender stereotypes is unlawful (Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 pm
Zarda / Bostock v. [read post]
