Search for: "Price v. King*" Results 21 - 40 of 1,102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2023, 6:25 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Many implementers will be tempted to ask the Controller of Patents to define a reasonable royalty if they consider the offer not to be FRAND.In this regard, the Controller of Patents has way less margin than competition authorities or courts to evaluate anticompetitive concerns beyond pure pricing issues (as it is customary in the European Union and UK).Despite its flaws, the willing licensee/licensor test created by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Huawei v ZTE takes… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” ““A legal malpractice claim accrues ‘when all the facts necessary to the cause of actionhave occurred and an injured party can obtain relief in court’” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002], quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]). [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am by Stephen Dnes
Overreach by Ofcom—in the form of a predatory low-price cap—was holding back regional business development, because it was not profitable to invest in higher value but also higher price next-generation communications systems. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Publication Date: January 1, 2023 ISBN: Print (Paperback): 9781552216699 Page Count: 232 pages Regular Price: 40.00 $ Excerpt: Introduction and Chapter Six “The Civil Law System”, pg. 111 [Footnotes omitted] Introduction I went to law school after working in the media for more than thirty years. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
Amazon has a new low-price health service called Amazon Clinic, where for as little as $30, patient-customers can consult with a clinician online from an Amazon partner, who can issue prescriptions. [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:00 am
But the plaintiff and defendant later agreed that the parcel would be listed with a real-estate broker, at varying prices, depending on how long it was listed (and went unsold). [read post]