Search for: "Price v. King*" Results 81 - 100 of 1,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 5:54 am by David Lat
* Meet David King of King v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:40 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: Naomi Egel & Steven Ward, Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors: The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear order Marius Wishman & Charles Butcher, Beyond ethnicity: historical states and modern conflict Hoo Tiang Boon, International identity construction: China’s pursuit of the responsible power identity and the American Other Tobias Berger, Worldmaking from the margins: interactions between domestic and international ordering in mid-20th-century India… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:54 am
In the first case, EMI (IP) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc [2012] EWHC 1644 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here, the facts were as follows. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  NML is a “vulture” fund which invested in Argentinian bonds at substantially discount prices between 2001 and 2003, taking advantage of the country’s urgent need for financing at the time. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:06 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Yetkin v London Borough of Newham [2010] EWCA Civ 776 (13 July 2010) Badger Trust v The Welsh Ministers [2010] EWCA Civ 807 (13 July 2010) Ghadami & Anor v Lyon Cole Insurance Group Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 767 (13 July 2010) FlooHorridge (t/a Newford Parts Centre) v Downshire House (Reproductions) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 777 (13 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Willett & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1620 (13… [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
Also see ---> Private student loan collection suit not removable to federal court (addressing state vs. federal jurisdiction issue in context of original collection suit; sanctions imposed for improper removal in Richards v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The price of DNO stock decreased by 4.1% on the first trading day after the publication of Ms Becker’s article. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  In Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EWHC Ch J20, the Court restrained publication of private etchings drawn by Queen Victoria and her husband. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 3:55 am by INFORRM
Finally, the Court was not convinced by Mr Barbulsecu’s explanation of why the account was used for personal purposes (he maintained it was because mobile phone prices were high and work demand was low at the relevant time). [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:18 am
Judge Woodlock comments that it appears the First Circuit may be waiting for possible guidance from the Supreme Court in the case of MetLife v. [read post]