Search for: "Price v. Maryland Casualty Company" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by John P. Ahlers
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 661 N.E.2d 967, 972 (NY 1995).WRM Clark Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
  [W]e must review the record in light of these obvious information costs”); Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company,[3] the Maryland district court held that when a law firm reimburses a customer trust account for which one of the law firm’s partners was the trustee, such loss would be considered a loss under both the “Direct means Direct” and “Proximate Cause” opinions. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46)   Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP)   Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two of the companies would donate more than $1 million to Republican campaigns after getting those deals. [read post]