Search for: "Price v. Medicare et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 pm
Johnson & Johnson, et. al., D.N.J., No. 1:24-cv-00671 (Feb. 5, 2024). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
Does 1-2 et. al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm
Schutte et al. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
[6] See Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:55 pm
YOSEF DEITSCH, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:54 pm
Department of Health and Human Services et al., July 25, 2022. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:09 am
Lythgoe MP, Desai A, et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:00 pm
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants., No. 6:21-CV-425-JDK, 2022 WL 542879 (E.D. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
The Seventh Circuit’s decision comes in the wake of the recent jury verdict in favor of CVS in the matter of Carl Washington (formerly known as Corcoran) et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 2:52 am
Texas Mutual Insurance Company, et al., US, Docket No. 20-748. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:29 am
Specifically, workers’ compensation insurers need only pay a “fair and reasonable” rate—calculated here to be 125% of the Medicare rate—and air-ambulance companies are forbidden from billing patients or their employers for the service. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:14 pm
Bechtold, et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:50 pm
CMS acknowledges the ruling in American Hospital Association et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:29 am
Nuvasive, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – February 1st, 2018) involves a claim of securities fraud. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:47 pm
Salus Rehabilitation, LLC, et al, 2018 WL 375720 (1/11/2018, M.D. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 1:17 pm
Omnicare, Inc., et al., 2016 WL 6407128, __ Fed. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 1:17 pm
Omnicare, Inc., et al., 2016 WL 6407128, __ Fed. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
Aetna Health, et al., 31 So. 3d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), the court interpreted the hospital’s contract language, “usual and customary provider charges,” as meaning the “fair market value” of the services rendered. [read post]
