Search for: "Price v. Phillips" Results 1 - 20 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
"Judge Price concurred, along with Judge Johnson and Judge Holcomb. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm by Alden Abbott
    As an initial matter, the ALJ rejected Petitioner’s assertion that trademark settlement agreements are not subject to antitrust scrutiny in light of FTC v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:05 am
" Id. at *5 (quotations and citations omitted).Held: "Because, here, the prosecutor failed to fulfill his duty to learn of and disclose favorable evidence that likely was in the possession of his lead investigating officer, and because the evidence of Phillips' criminal history is material, we hold that the prosecutor violated Price's rights under Brady v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:23 am by Thomas Baer
They supported their argument with the Supreme Court decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by Adam Wahlberg
Carter Phillips of Sidely Austin, last year's cover subject in Washington, DC Super Lawyers, appeared yesterday before the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:56 am
The Texas Supreme Court considered this issue in Phillips Petroleum Co v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:15 am by Alex Woolgar
This proposition is - again - uncontroversial in light of Douglas v Hello!. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
Accordingly, Lord Brown was in the majority in Briggs-Price, which included Lord Phillips himself and Lord Mance. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:16 am by Joy Waltemath
While opponents of the traditional approach to Title VII argue that their position is compelled by the Supreme Court’s Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:33 am
(For prior Law Blog coverage of Phillips, click here and here.) [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:15 am by WSLL
Price II, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: Billie LM Addleman; and Kara L. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:34 am by Charles Sartain
Having made an agreement for certain price, which determined the value, Phillips was pretty much stuck with that valuation. [read post]