Search for: "Price v. Pierce" Results 1 - 20 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm by Michael Smith
 The Indiana Court of Appeals answered that question, and a couple of others related to veil piercing, in Country Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm by Michael Smith
 The Indiana Court of Appeals answered that question, and a couple of others related to veil piercing, in Country Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm by Michael Smith
 The Indiana Court of Appeals answered that question, and a couple of others related to veil piercing, in Country Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:47 am
Last week the LLC Law Monitor blog by Doug Batey of Stoel Rives commented on a Massacusetts case, Kosanovich v. 80 Worcester Street Associates, LLC, No. 201201 CV 001748, 2014 WL 2565959 (Mass. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:47 am by Michael Smith
Last week the LLC Law Monitor blog by Doug Batey of Stoel Rives commented on a Massacusetts case, Kosanovich v. 80 Worcester Street Associates, LLC, No. 201201 CV 001748, 2014 WL 2565959 (Mass. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 11:34 am
The case, which handed a win to CITGO allowing it to charge higher prices than those urged by The Pantry, is The Pantry, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lewis v Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price Hecht LLP  2021 NY Slip Op 03911 Decided on June 17, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department shows the high bar for a Judiciary Law § 487 claim. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:01 am
They cited a recent decision, Pettiford v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
In an article in the latest issue of IDEA (published by Franklin Pierce Law School) entitled "Following the Direction of TrafFix: Trade Dress Law and Functionality Revisited," Professor Amy Cohen of Western New England College School of Law reviews the history of product configuration trade dress law, including its expansion in the 1980s through the Supreme Court's attempt in TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]