Search for: "Price v. Price et al" Results 101 - 120 of 1,523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2022, 11:18 am by Florian Mueller
Google argues that the class action lawyers went too far, and on that basis has appealed to the Ninth Circuit the district court's decision to certify a consumer class:Ninth Circuit appeal no. 22-80140; Mary Carr, et al v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
# # #SOURCEBaron et al. v. iFIT Health and Fitness Inc. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
The tax gain for North Carolina is likely less than the tax loss for New York, while the lower effective (tax-reduced) price reduces costs for New York smokers. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:23 am by Peter Mahler
The Care One Case The above facts are drawn from a not-for-publication opinion handed down last month by a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division — that state’s intermediate appellate court — in a case captioned Care One, LLC, et al. v Adina Straus and Jeffrey Rubin. [read post]
Insider Trading NFT marketplaces are also vulnerable to insider trading, where employees use insider information to purchase exclusive NFTs before they are available to the public and then sell them for a profit once prices spike.[8] The U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by assoulineberlowe
The Hydrogen Technology Corporation et al In the Southern District of New York, the SEC brought another civil action. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 10:53 pm by Florian Mueller
Avanci et al., United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case no. 20-11032: April 20, 2022 "Brief of Amici Curiae ACT | The App Association, Computer and Communication[s] Industry Association, High Tech Inventor[s] Alliance, and Public Interest Patent Law Institute in support of petition for interference en banc" (I haven't mentioned Perkins Coie before, but I know and respect former as well as current Perkins partners)Google v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
That article is cited in the Justice Gorsuch's dissent in Oklahoma v. [read post]