Search for: "Price v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 11,987
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2024, 2:45 am by Rebecca Daramola (Bristows)
SES is the registered proprietor of the EP 3883277 (EP 277), which relates to the spatial arrangement of components within electronic shelf labels that display price information in sales areas. [read post]
In his opening statement, Mr Kirkland discussed ASIC’s responses to findings from two of its major reports published in 2023, namely: Report 765: When the price is not right: Making good on insurance pricing promises, which revealed systemic failures by insurers to fulfil their pricing promises; and Report 768: Navigating the storm: ASIC’s review of home insurance claims, which revealed weaknesses in five key areas related to claims handling. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:52 am by Bona Law PC
In the blog post, the FTC includes a previous Statement of Interest (“SOI”) filed in the Duffy v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Thus, in Auerbach v Bennett (47 NY2d 619 [1979]), New York’s highest court held that courts have the power in shareholder derivative litigation to grant unnamed interested shareholders leave to intervene – even for the first time on appeal. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
This is because the FTC states that consumers would not switch to mass-market or true luxury handbags “in sufficient volumes to render the price increase unprofitable. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Additionally, most negotiations had to take place quickly and often in auctions promoted by the Nazis, resulting in property being sold at prices below their actual market value. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]