Search for: "Price v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 13,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 8:25 am by Eugene Volokh
States have at times tried to restrict such labeling, but BellSouth Tellecommunications, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:44 am by luiza
Although Silver’s complaint included publicly available information, his personal knowledge of non-public information about defendant PharMerica’s pricing was critical to his allegations of fraudulent conduct. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:11 pm by My name
However, Lumbermans has stated that part of the deficiency in the price reports is a lack of sufficient information. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:25 pm by Jarod Bona
Many states maintain their per se prohibitions in their own antitrust statutes against vertical price-fixing. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am by Keith Mallinson
” Similarly, in Germany in Nokia v Daimler, the Mannheim court stated that the “royalty provided in [Daimler’s] counter-offer is not reasonable, as the reference value used in the top-down approach in the form of the average purchase price of [TCUs] is unsuitable. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:00 am by Record on Appeal
Legal Writing Pro Ross Guberman offers an analysis of Wal-Mart’s brief in the recent United States Supreme Court case Wal-Mart v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:54 am
As this blog has discussed previously, the law surrounding resale price maintenance has been unclear ever since the Supreme Court's decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]