Search for: "Price v. State of Illinois" Results 1 - 20 of 835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm by Bona Law PC
This hardly seemed fair, so the United States Supreme Court in the classic case of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
The states alleged violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and the New York, Illinois and Michigan antitrust statutes. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:23 am by Thomas Baer
Illinois, which stated that indirect purchasers were unable to bring suits forward. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:31 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The court found that the dealership’s advertising, which touted false price reductions, violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:00 am by Susan Schneider
  She recently co-authored a Farm Docs article, Price Later Contracts and the Illinois Grain Code: An Update from the Court’s Decision in Miller v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:06 am by msW1Ld
  California now joins Illinois, New York and Michigan (see March 31, 2008 Post) in treating resale price maintenance as a per se offense in violation of its state antitrust law even though such conduct is subject to rule of reason review under section 1 of the Sherman Act after Leegin Creative Lether Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 8:36 am
  The March 31, 2008 post reported that the New York, Michigan and Illinois attorneys general obtained a consent decree under state law against Herman Miller for its resale price maintenance scheme. [read post]