Search for: "Price v. U. S.*"
Results 1 - 20
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst., 593 U. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
The Act would create a presumption that a defendant entered into an agreement, contract, or conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the antitrust laws if the defendant: (i) distributed a pricing algorithm to two or more persons with the intent that the pricing algorithm be used to set or recommend a price or (ii) used a pricing algorithm to set or recommend a price or commercial term of a product or service and the pricing… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Corporate Law, 90 U. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Reprinted with permission from the NYS Bar Association, this article first appeared in the EASL Journal, 2023, vol. 34, no. 1. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
However, price data[3] from coinmarketcap.com show that XRP is too volatile to reliably serve as a store of value and is likely to be purchased primarily for speculative purposes: The opinion identifies SEC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:35 am
” Maurer v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm
Allegheny County Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
[7]. 397 U. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Outside of this directive, the agencies generally have taken the view that prior enforcement of the antitrust laws was too lax and that the narrow focus on more traditional antitrust harms (such as higher prices, reduced output, or lower quality) has been too narrow. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 1:00 pm
3M Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
” Referring to the now-defunct Interstate Commerce Commission and Civil Aeronautics Board, she noted “the disastrous regulatory frameworks in the transportation industry teach the attentive student that rules stifle innovation, increase costs, raise prices, limit choice, and decrease output, frequently harming the very parties they are intended to benefit, and the benefits that flowed to consumers when competition replaced regulation in transportation. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
In Advisers, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 6:09 am
Pharmacychecker.Com, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
Love v. [read post]
