Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 361 - 380 of 5,792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Antitrust Today
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider its September 16 2010, ruling that plaintiffs in the ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation have no standing to pursue their price fixing claims against an ATM network and a group of banks. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
McKesson Corp., 573 F.Supp.2d 431 (Aug. 26, 2008), the District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a national class action antitrust complaint, borrowing from the recent United States Supreme Court decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am by David Kopel
(David Kopel) To me, today’s decision of the United States District Court for the District of Utah in Brown v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Lon Sobel
The United States Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by Sony Music, Vivendi, Warner Music and EMI, in Sony Music v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:06 pm by Reference Staff
One of the most famous censorship cases to land in the courts is United States v. [read post]
Class representatives and their counsel in the Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation have won another initial round in their suit alleging that Chinese vitamin C manufacturers conspired to fix prices and to limit the output of vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:09 am
VIP PRODUCTS LLC (Opinion, United States Supreme Court) Agencies issue fina... [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:42 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer http://www.rrbdlaw.com/4696/securities-industry-commentator/United States of America, Appellee, v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:36 pm by Mack Sperling
The parties in the case are engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of bottled water in the Southeastern United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:31 am by Tom
Friend, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously agreed that a corporations “principal place of business,” for purposes of determining whether federal courts have diversity jurisdiction (that is, all parties on one side of the versus (“v”) sign are from states different from all parties on the opposite side) to hear a case. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm by ipandentertainmentlaw
District Judge in Seattle ruled that transporting and reselling unaltered “Trader Joe’s” branded products in Canada does not give rise to a lawsuit for trademark infringement in the United States under U.S. trademark laws. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm by Dan Bushell
2011 will surely go down as the Year of the Class Action in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:30 am
  The second is the potential for increased price regulation on pharmaceuticals in the United States. [read post]