Search for: "Price v. Vincent"
Results 21 - 40
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm
("VINCENT"). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
”’ Vincent v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:17 am
” In his defense, James contended that Vincent’s name was put on the 1996 deed “as a convenience” since he did contribute financially to the purchase price; that Vincent “fraudulently transferred” the property to the LLC without James’s consent; and that, rather than being a 50% member of the LLC, Vincent was merely an employee or independent contractor. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
” Laster v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:36 am
Vincent and Liza Concepcion sued AT&T for deceptive practices because the company allegedly advertised discounted cell phones but charged sales tax on the full retail price. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:45 am
The base price is about ten percent higher than on Amazon's U.S. site, but unless you are going to spend $125 total and thereby get free AmazonGlobal Saver shipping, it would still be cheaper overall. [read post]
1 May 2011, 10:34 am
”The court ruled against cell phone customers Vincent and Liza Concepcion, who sued AT&T for advertising discounted cell phones but charging sales tax—$30.22—on the full retail price. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm
In London v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 5:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
Vincent School for Boys, Catholic Charities CYO v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court—in Hughes v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 4:47 am
Simon-Whelan v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
Vincent’s School for Boys, Catholic Charites CYO v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 7:06 am
Star Athletica v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
Louis University School of Law invited me to deliver the 2017 Vincent C. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
This week evidence was given, by among others, New Zealand cricketers, Lou Vincent and Brendon McCullum. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:53 pm
The low price and the absence of records proving that Flechtheim received the sales proceeds from Vömel and that he was able to freely dispose of the sales proceeds, make this a clear case of Nazi looted art, according to the heirs’ lawyer. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:38 am
., v. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 9:36 am
The implications of the price of shares and whether or not it is high has been part of the focus. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:16 pm
Esparza, 540 U.S. 12, 17–19 (2003); Price v. [read post]
