Search for: "Prince v. Harper" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2019, 12:23 pm
The statute identifies four non-exhaustive  factors to be considered in a fair use inquiry: (1) the purpose and character of the use; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the substantiality of the portion used; and (4) the effect on the potential market or value of the copyrighted work and its derivatives (citing Harper & Row v Nation Enterprises).In line with the common judicial approach, the court placed most importance on the first factor. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Harper: A challenge to the right of state courts to strike down or change legislation governing congressional and presidential elections under the “independent state legislature doctrine. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:48 am by Lorraine Fleck
Last chance to register for OBA Institute IT Law for All: key IP law topics geared to generalist & in-house lawyers http://bit.ly/xMKQrU Microsoft withdraws one patent claim against Barnes & Noble http://cnet.co/AdSif6 Anonymous hacks lawyers for Marine accused of Iraq massacre cnet.co/yivSwI RIM should remain Canadian: Harper natpo.st/AkDl2B How to identify fake Facebook accounts cnet.co/xJY92x iPhone patent wars: What’s going on in Germany? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:49 am by Lorraine Fleck
Last chance to register for OBA Institute IT Law for All: key IP law topics geared to generalist & in-house lawyers http://bit.ly/xMKQrU Microsoft withdraws one patent claim against Barnes & Noble http://cnet.co/AdSif6 Anonymous hacks lawyers for Marine accused of Iraq massacre cnet.co/yivSwI RIM should remain Canadian: Harper natpo.st/AkDl2B How to identify fake Facebook accounts cnet.co/xJY92x iPhone patent wars: What’s going on in Germany? [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Marsh., 9 F Cas, 342, 348 (No. 4,901) (CC Mass 1841)(Story, J.) and Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
He took care to confirm that a “would-be fair user of another’s work must have justification for the taking” (emphasis added). 3See What did Google Books Decision do to Cariou v Prince for a discussion of Leval’s focus on justification. [read post]