Search for: "Prince v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
The publishers will pay all of Prince Harry’s legal costs, plus around £300,000 extra in damages. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign states, kings… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
First, to determine whether a partnership formed, courts “must consider whether the parties expressly or implicitly intended to become partners” (Hammond v Smith, 151 AD3d 1896 [4th Dept 2017]). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer IP Reporter
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts   1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts   1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ben Roberts-Smith will pay defendants’ legal costs in his failed defamation case, ABC reports. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am by Austin Sarat
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Prince Harry faced two days of cross-examination this week as Fancourt J continued to hear the trial in the case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The full 742 page, 2618 paragraph judgment, Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited (No 41) [2023] FCA 555, was published  on 5 June 2023. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Doolittle changed storyline involving “Prince Bumpo” asking to lighten his skin. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
  He said news coverage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle “knowingly monetises hatred. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am by Josh Blackman
This example also echoed another case pending before the Court this term: Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Carolyn Pepper of Reed Smith LLP writes for the Press Gazette on the application of libel law to ‘deep fakes,’ which are digital impersonations of well-known individuals. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:50 pm by Brent Wieand
The artwork in question is a series of portraits that Andy Warhol created from use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph of the musician Prince. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on 20 and 21 July 2022, the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Sharp P and King LJ) heard the appeal Guardian News and Media v Executor of HRH Prince Philip challenging the decision to exclude the press from the hearing in September 2021 regarding the will of Prince Philip. [read post]