Search for: "Prior v. Hager"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
Hager v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 1:57 pm
Hager, 69 N.Y.2d 141, 512 N.Y.S.2d 794 (1987); People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
After the North Dakota agents received this information, they investigated Hager further and found he had “at least two prior law enforcement contacts as a result of his interest in young girls. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:17 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:17 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 9:41 am
Hager - "Based on the foregoing, we find the trial court did not abuse its discretion by not holding an additional hearing prior entering findings of fact and a judgment on remand, or by awarding child support to Father, the non-custodial parent. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:38 am
On appeal, Hager argued that “there was insufficient evidence presented by the State to convict her of computer crimes and theft. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
Although this can be a winning argument (as discussed below with respect to Ex parte Hager), it doesn't seem to be what won here. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
Although this can be a winning argument (as discussed below with respect to Ex parte Hager), it doesn't seem to be what won here. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
Hager’s right to a fair trial. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 11:18 am
” Hager v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Hager) sent the following email to Mr. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
